Aydın Tiryaki (June 22, 2026)
Football is the world’s greatest and most unifying force, yet the FIFA World Cup — the pinnacle of the game — continues to revolve around the dominance of certain geographies and established football cultures. Expanding the tournament to 48 teams was a positive step toward broader global representation, but the ruthless competition of regional qualifying still makes it nearly impossible for many nations to reach this grand stage. Being placed in highly competitive confederations such as Europe or South America can become an insurmountable wall for developing football nations. For the World Cup to truly become the cup of the world, a structural and innovative adjustment is needed.
The model proposed here is built on the premise that 4 of the 48 slots in the expanded tournament should be reserved exclusively for countries that have never previously qualified for the World Cup.
How the Model Works: A 16-Team Preliminary Tournament
The holders of these four special slots will be determined through a merit-based, FIFA-ranking-driven preliminary tournament with 16 participating teams.
Selection of Participants: Nations that have never qualified for a World Cup throughout history are identified, and the 16 teams ranked highest in the current FIFA rankings among this group are invited to the tournament.
Voluntary Participation Principle: Participation will be entirely voluntary. Countries that wish to decline — due to infrastructure limitations, budget constraints, or squad weaknesses — may waive their right; in such cases, the list will be completed by the next eligible team in the FIFA rankings.
Draw and Group Stage: The 16 selected teams will be divided into four pots of four based on FIFA points, forming four groups with one team from each pot. A single round-robin format will be applied within each group, ensuring every team competes against all others on equal footing.
Knockout Matches: The group winners, or the top two finishers from each group (depending on the format determined by the tournament schedule), will face each other in cross-bracket single-leg elimination matches. The four teams that win these final matches will earn their ticket to the World Cup.
Sustainability and the Cyclical Structure
One of the most legitimate criticisms of this system is that the pool of “nations that have never qualified” will eventually be exhausted, or that only very weak football nations will remain. However, the proposed model contains a self-sustaining cycle.
When the pool of never-qualified nations runs dry or falls below a competitive threshold, the system will automatically transition to the criterion of “nations that have gone the longest without qualifying.” This way, established football nations that have been absent from the tournament for decades will also have a chance to re-enter the excitement.
Organizational and Economic Contributions
This 16-team preliminary tournament will not only add new colors to football — it will also serve as a strategic asset for the host country and FIFA:
Test Tournament Function: It will fill the void left by the abolition of the Confederations Cup. Held in the host country a few months or a year before the World Cup, it will allow a genuine rehearsal of stadiums, transport networks, security protocols, and overall organizational capacity.
Economic Vitality: It will create an additional source of tourism and broadcast revenue for the host country while preventing stadiums from sitting idle.
Challenges and Alternative Perspectives
Several structural obstacles and criticisms must also be taken into account when considering the implementation of this inclusive model.
In today’s football world, clubs and players already cite an overly congested match calendar as their biggest grievance. Adding an extra 16-team tournament to the fixture list may cause clubs to resist releasing players to their national teams. Furthermore, concerns exist that the heavy defeats some of these qualifying teams may suffer against elite sides in the World Cup finals could damage the tournament’s brand value. Broadcasters may also hesitate to invest in matches featuring teams with limited commercial appeal.
Yet football belongs to the entire world, not just to elites and large economies. Scheduling conflicts can be overcome with proper planning. The concern over competitive imbalance on the pitch will, in the long run, be resolved by the vision and developmental momentum that developing nations gain by stepping onto that grand stage.
The Ranking Paradox: The Absent Yet Stronger
The necessity of this proposal can also be demonstrated with concrete figures. A look at the current FIFA rankings as of 11 June 2026 reveals that some nations that have never qualified for the World Cup hold higher FIFA points than several of the 48 teams currently competing in the tournament.
The most striking example is Venezuela. The only CONMEBOL member never to have reached a World Cup final in the confederation’s history, Venezuela sits 49th in the FIFA rankings with 1469.18 points — clearly ahead of current tournament participants Curaçao (1294.77 points, 82nd), Haiti (1293.10 points, 83rd), and New Zealand (1275.58 points, 85th). In other words, three national teams are competing on a stage that a country ranked more than thirty places above them in FIFA’s own system has never been allowed to reach.
A similar picture applies to Mali (1455.59 points, 55th) and Burkina Faso (1406.99 points, 62nd). These two West African nations — both of whom have reached the Africa Cup of Nations final twice — are ranked above current participants Qatar (56th), Iraq (57th), South Africa (60th), Saudi Arabia (61st), Jordan (63rd), Bosnia-Herzegovina (64th), Cape Verde (67th), and Ghana (73rd), yet have never appeared at a World Cup.
This paradox is not accidental — it is structural. While FIFA rankings measure individual team strength, World Cup slots are distributed on a confederation basis. A strong team in a highly competitive confederation like South America or Africa can be eliminated within its own region, while a far lower-ranked team from a less competitive confederation qualifies with relative ease. The proposed four-slot model carries the potential to partially correct precisely this structural injustice — through a mechanism based on individual merit rather than regional quota.
Conclusion
In conclusion, these four special slots at the World Cup would be a revolutionary step: one that directly serves football’s mission of globalization, partially addresses longstanding inequities, and adds entirely new stories to the global football economy.
Annex 1: Hypothetical 16-Team Preliminary Tournament Roster
Should the proposed model be applied today, the following 16 teams — selected from nations that have never qualified for a World Cup, ranked by their current FIFA standing — would be invited to the preliminary tournament.
| # | Country | FIFA Rank | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Venezuela | 49 | 1469.18 |
| 2 | Mali | 55 | 1455.59 |
| 3 | Burkina Faso | 62 | 1406.99 |
| 4 | Albania | 66 | 1376.03 |
| 5 | North Macedonia | 69 | 1369.16 |
| 6 | Georgia | 72 | 1355.26 |
| 7 | Finland | 75 | 1341.92 |
| 8 | Kosovo | 78 | 1319.12 |
| 9 | Oman | 79 | 1306.90 |
| 10 | Montenegro | 80 | 1301.98 |
| 11 | Guinea | 81 | 1295.60 |
| 12 | Syria | 84 | 1283.05 |
| 13 | Gabon | 86 | 1272.51 |
| 14 | Uganda | 89 | 1264.09 |
| 15 | Zambia | 90 | 1255.82 |
| 16 | Bahrain | 92 | 1254.41 |
Annex 2: FIFA Rankings of the 48 Nations Competing at the 2026 World Cup
| FIFA Rank | Team | Group | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Argentina | J | 1877.27 |
| 2 | Spain | H | 1874.71 |
| 3 | France | I | 1870.70 |
| 4 | England | L | 1828.02 |
| 5 | Portugal | K | 1767.85 |
| 6 | Brazil | C | 1765.86 |
| 7 | Morocco | C | 1755.10 |
| 8 | Netherlands | F | 1753.57 |
| 9 | Belgium | G | 1742.24 |
| 10 | Germany | E | 1735.77 |
| 11 | Croatia | L | 1714.87 |
| 13 | Colombia | K | 1698.35 |
| 14 | Mexico | A | 1687.48 |
| 15 | Senegal | I | 1684.07 |
| 16 | Uruguay | H | 1673.07 |
| 17 | USA | D | 1671.23 |
| 18 | Japan | F | 1661.58 |
| 19 | Switzerland | B | 1650.06 |
| 20 | Iran | G | 1619.58 |
| 22 | Turkey | D | 1605.73 |
| 23 | Ecuador | E | 1598.52 |
| 24 | Austria | J | 1597.40 |
| 25 | South Korea | A | 1591.63 |
| 27 | Australia | D | 1579.34 |
| 28 | Algeria | J | 1571.03 |
| 29 | Egypt | G | 1562.37 |
| 30 | Canada | B | 1559.48 |
| 31 | Norway | I | 1557.44 |
| 33 | Ivory Coast | E | 1540.87 |
| 34 | Panama | L | 1539.16 |
| 38 | Sweden | F | 1509.79 |
| 40 | Czech Republic | A | 1505.74 |
| 41 | Paraguay | D | 1505.35 |
| 42 | Scotland | C | 1503.34 |
| 45 | Tunisia | F | 1476.41 |
| 46 | DR Congo | K | 1474.43 |
| 50 | Uzbekistan | K | 1458.73 |
| 56 | Qatar | B | 1450.31 |
| 57 | Iraq | I | 1446.28 |
| 60 | South Africa | A | 1428.38 |
| 61 | Saudi Arabia | H | 1423.88 |
| 63 | Jordan | J | 1387.74 |
| 64 | Bosnia-Herzegovina | B | 1387.22 |
| 67 | Cape Verde | H | 1371.11 |
| 73 | Ghana | L | 1346.88 |
| 82 | Curaçao | E | 1294.77 |
| 83 | Haiti | C | 1293.10 |
| 85 | New Zealand | G | 1275.58 |
Note: Rankings are based on the official FIFA/Coca-Cola Men’s World Ranking dated 11 June 2026. The next official update is scheduled for 20 July 2026.
Publication Notes
All concepts and the qualifying model presented in this article were originally developed by Aydın Tiryaki.
The initial dialogues for this article were conducted with Gemini. However, Gemini indicated that it was unable to provide verified data on the hypothetical 16-team preliminary roster or the FIFA ranking positions of the 48 World Cup participants. The text was subsequently transferred to Claude, which compiled both datasets via web search and contributed to the drafting of the “Ranking Paradox” section.
Concept and Model: Aydın Tiryaki Initial Dialogue: Gemini (Google) Data Compilation and Additional Section: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) Prepared for Publication by: Aydın Tiryaki
| aydintiryaki.org | YouTube | Aydın Tiryaki’nin Yazıları ve Videoları │Articles and Videos by Aydın Tiryaki | Bilgi Merkezi│Knowledge Hub | ░ Virgülüne Dokunmadan │ Verbatim ░ | ░ Dünya Kupası’nda Kapsayıcılık: Hiç Katılmamış Ülkeler İçin Yeni Bir Ön Eleme Modeli │Inclusivity at the World Cup: A New Preliminary Tournament Model for Nations That Have Never Qualified ░ 22.06.2026
Aydın Tiryaki 