Aydın Tiryaki (2026)

Introduction The fundamental objective of “The Great Reckoning” project is to restore the scales of social justice distorted by state interventions. However, during this restoration process, there is a risk that advantaged (indebted) parties may use civil society organizations (CSOs), foundations, and associations as a “mask” to evade systemic “pruning.” This article explains why institutional philanthropic activities will not be included in the “Social Balance Score” calculations and why this decision is vital for societal neutrality.

1. A Barrier Against “Score Engineering” and Sham Transactions

The system does not allow for the offsetting of individual social debts through donations to foundations.

• Prohibition of Camouflage: Foundations established or funded by an advantaged individual with the aim of lowering their social debt (score) are not recognized as a deduction in the “Great Ledger.” Otherwise, the system—financed by the taxes of honest citizens—could turn into a “sham mechanism” where the wealthy “launder” their scores by transferring funds to entities under their own control.
• Control of Resources: Justice is served not merely through the transfer of money, but through its service to the public good. Transferring funds to one’s own foundation means keeping the money within one’s sphere of influence; therefore, it does not count as a genuine “social repayment” or rebalancing.

2. The Filter for Ideological and Group Narrowing

Social benefit is only “rebalancing” when it encompasses the whole of society.

• Partisan Favoritism: Today, many civil society organizations serve only a specific political view, religion, sect, or group. Allowing such structures to receive points from the system under the guise of “social benefit” would compromise the neutrality of justice.
• Rejection of Fragmented Justice: Activities of a structure that only serves its “own neighborhood” do not align with the universal justice understanding of “The Great Reckoning.” The system does not act as a judge of who performs “better” charity; instead, it maintains everyone on the same objective “Social Balance Line.”

3. The Principle of “Let Not the Left Hand Know What the Right Hand Gives”

The system opposes turning kindness into a “bargaining chip.”

• Conscientious Invisibility: If a foundation’s activity is performed with genuine sincerity, there should be no need to record it as a “credit” in the state’s ledger of justice. Kindness must remain outside the system, in its own pure and conscientious domain.
• Avoiding Score Chasing: When a business person or institution performs an act of charity knowing they cannot “polish” their social score with it, that act becomes true virtue. The Social Balance System does not tarnish this virtue by turning it into a “trade of points.”

4. Systemic Neutrality and Security

Excluding foundations and associations ensures that the model remains “tamper-proof.”

• Clear Boundaries: Citizens will know that no one can evade the accountability of their share of the common social pie by hiding under the mask of a foundation. This transparency reinforces the trust of the disadvantaged in the system.
• Decisiveness of Pruning Processes: Restrictions on the acquisition speed of those with systemic advantages (pruning) will continue to be applied resolutely according to the 20-year calendar, independent of any foundation activities.

Conclusion “The Great Reckoning” does not reject civil society; on the contrary, it ensures that civil society remains a pure domain of volunteerism, free from “score anxiety.” By keeping foundations and associations out of the calculator and eliminating the risk of institutional camouflage, this model proves that true justice can only be achieved when no “special escape routes” are granted to anyone.

| aydintiryaki.org | YouTube | Aydın Tiryaki’nin Yazıları ve Videoları │Articles and Videos by Aydın Tiryaki | Bilgi Merkezi│Knowledge Hub  | ░ Sosyal Denge ve Eşitlik İçin… │ … for Social Balance and Equality ░ 16.02.2026

---

A Note on Methods and Tools: All observations, ideas, and solution proposals in this study are the author’s own. AI was utilized as an information source for researching and compiling relevant topics strictly based on the author’s inquiries, requests, and directions; additionally, it provided writing assistance during the drafting process. (The research-based compilation and English writing process of this text were supported by AI as a specialized assistant.)