Claude Sonnet 4,5
I have carefully examined your article published in November 2025 at the following link: https://aydintiryaki.org/2025/11/09/bir-yapay-zeka-yaklasimi-futbolda-penalti-atisi-kuralinin-degistirilmesi-onerisi/
Within this article, there are dialogues with different AI models and the texts they generated in response to a standard command set (prompt) you prepared regarding a proposal to change the penalty rule in football.
As you requested, I have prepared a detailed “Performance and Success Evaluation” for each AI model separately by analyzing the texts in the article. I conducted my analysis according to the following criteria and created a separate subsection for each model:
1. GOOGLE GEMINI
Compliance with Prompts (Commands)
Success Level: 8/10
Gemini completed all the basic required tasks:
- ✅ Date (November 9, 2025) correctly placed
- ✅ Signature information (Aydın Tiryaki, Ankara, Turkey) added completely
- ✅ TFF information note included in both letters
- ❌ Clearly inadequate in PDF creation – Stated “As an artificial intelligence model, I do not have the ability to create PDF files directly” without offering a solution
Turkish Text and Communication Success
Success Level: 9/10
Gemini’s Turkish letters are extremely professional and comply with official correspondence norms:
- Grammatically flawless and fluent
- Appropriate greetings such as “Dear FIFA Officials” used
- Sentences well-structured and persuasive
- Dialogue tone respectful and helpful: “I am pleased to help you with this comprehensive request”
English Translation Success
Success Level: 9/10
The English version is natural and professional, not mechanical:
- “Dear FIFA Officials” is formal and appropriate
- Academic English norms properly used with structures like “It is proposed that…”
- Semantic integrity in Turkish successfully transferred to English
- Minor weakness: Some sentences are slightly long and remain faithful to Turkish structure
Critical Approach Test
Success Level: 10/10
Gemini was definitely the most successful model in this test. It brought genuinely constructive and deep criticisms in the evaluation section:
- Emphasized injury and risk management as “THE BIGGEST point of criticism”
- Noted concrete drawbacks such as “An injured player taking the shot under pressure is risky both for their health and shot quality”
- Intelligently criticized the “Limitation of the Basketball Analogy”
- Offered pragmatic solutions such as testing the proposal with pilot applications
- Did not just approve, considered actual football dynamics
2. ChatGPT
Compliance with Prompts
Success Level: 10/10
ChatGPT met all requirements completely:
- ✅ Date correct (November 9, 2025)
- ✅ Signature information complete
- ✅ TFF information note added (“For information: Turkish Football Federation (TFF)”)
- ✅ Created PDF files and provided download links – “FIFA_Mektup_Turkce.pdf” and “FIFA_Letter_English.pdf”
This is a significant achievement in terms of technical capabilities.
Turkish Text and Communication Success
Success Level: 8/10
Turkish texts are professional and understandable:
- Compliant with official correspondence norms
- Grammar correct
- However, style somewhat more “corporate/generic” – not as personalized as Gemini
- Dialogue tone very helpful but sometimes overly procedural: “Turkish and English letters prepared… Now it’s time to evaluate. Shall I prepare it?”
English Translation Success
Success Level: 8.5/10
English text is quality and professional:
- Not literal translation, semantic translation performed
- Natural expressions used like “This proposal draws inspiration from basketball”
- Minor shortcoming: English version slightly shorter than Turkish letter, some nuances missing
Critical Approach Test
Success Level: 6/10
ChatGPT provided criticism but remained superficial:
- Used general headings like “Psychological Pressure” and “Tactical Limitation”
- However, criticisms not detailed, no in-depth football analysis
- “Complex Rules” criticism exists but did not present concrete scenarios like Gemini
- Generally balanced but not truly critical, more of an “advantage-disadvantage list”
3. GROK
Compliance with Prompts
Success Level: 7/10
Grok completed basic tasks:
- ✅ Date correct
- ✅ Signature information complete
- ✅ TFF information note added
- ❌ Refused to create PDF: “My current tools do not support PDF creation (tools are only for reading existing PDFs)”
- However, made an honest and clear explanation on this matter
Turkish Text and Communication Success
Success Level: 7.5/10
Turkish letter is decent but somewhat “rigid”:
- Official format correct but sentences sometimes too long and complex
- Very formal titles used like “Subject: Proposal Regarding the Change of the Penalty Kick Rule”
- Grammar correct but fluency lower than Gemini
- Dialogue tone somewhat didactic: “I evaluated your proposal and in accordance with your requests…”
English Translation Success
Success Level: 8/10
English text is quality:
- Natural and professional
- Effective openings used like “I am writing to FIFA, the world’s most prestigious…”
- Fully parallel structure with Turkish, no semantic loss
Critical Approach Test
Success Level: 8/10
Grok is assertive in critical approach:
- Emphasized complexity issue: “Referee decisions become controversial, matches slow down”
- Addressed game abuse scenarios like “Injury simulation would increase”
- Clearly stated its own opinion: “Pilot tests should be done, but I’m against it – current rules are sufficient”
- This shows the model truly thinks critically
4. DEEPSEEK
Compliance with Prompts
Success Level: 10/10
Deepseek showed perfect performance technically:
- ✅ All details complete
- ✅ Created PDF files and provided download links
- Prepared professional format letters in both languages
Turkish Text and Communication Success
Success Level: 9.5/10
Deepseek’s Turkish texts are extremely impressive:
- Prepared the longest and most detailed letters
- Very appropriate greetings like “Esteemed FIFA Management”
- Sentence structures perfect, fluent and persuasive
- Dialogue tone very professional and polite: “First of all, thank you for this detailed and thought-provoking proposal”
English Translation Success
Success Level: 10/10
English text probably the best:
- Full compliance with academic English standards
- Not literal translation, cultural adaptation performed
- Professional structures like “I am writing to present a proposal…”
- Equivalent quality to Turkish
Critical Approach Test
Success Level: 9.5/10
Deepseek provided the most detailed and balanced criticism:
- Addressed manipulation risks under the heading “Strategic Injury Scenarios”
- Explained the issue of “Contrary to Football’s Nature” by comparing with basketball
- “Risk of Creating Injustice” – analyzed the situation where the fouled player is a poor shooter
- Presented both positive and negative aspects in a balanced way, made genuinely constructive criticism
- Perfect conclusion: “While valuable as an interesting thought experiment, there are too many practical obstacles to overcome for it to be accepted as a fundamental rule change”
5. MICROSOFT COPILOT
Compliance with Prompts
Success Level: 6/10
Copilot completed some basic tasks but has shortcomings:
- ✅ Date correct
- ✅ Signature information present
- ✅ TFF information note added
- ❌ Did not create PDF – Only said “If you wish, I can also explain the steps to help you convert these texts to Word or PDF format,” did not provide a direct solution
Turkish Text and Communication Success
Success Level: 7/10
Turkish texts are adequate but ordinary:
- Grammar correct
- However, letter quite short and lacking detail
- Style very “generic” – not as customized as other models
- Dialogue tone overly familiar: “When you’re ready, let me know, let’s proceed together” – too informal for an official task
English Translation Success
Success Level: 7.5/10
English text is adequate:
- Professional but short
- Some important details omitted
- Full parallelism between Turkish and English but both are superficial
Critical Approach Test
Success Level: 5/10
Copilot is the least critical model:
- Presented simple advantage-disadvantage list with bullet points
- No in-depth analysis
- General expressions like “Complex rules,” “May slow down the flow of the game”
- Did not make a real criticism, just listed possible problems
6. PERPLEXITY
Compliance with Prompts
Success Level: 6/10
Perplexity completed basic tasks:
- ✅ Date correct
- ✅ Signature information present
- ✅ TFF information note added
- ❌ Did not create PDF – Passed responsibility to user saying “You may need to use a different platform for PDF preparation”
Turkish Text and Communication Success
Success Level: 8/10
Turkish letter is balanced and professional:
- Grammar correct and fluent
- Compliant with official correspondence norms
- Letter short but effective
- Dialogue tone helpful: “Is there anything else you’d like me to help with?”
English Translation Success
Success Level: 8.5/10
English text is quality:
- Natural and professional
- Good balance between Turkish and English
- Cultural adaptation performed
Critical Approach Test
Success Level: 7/10
Perplexity made balanced criticism:
- Emphasized that “it may reduce tactical flexibility”
- Intelligent criticism that “it may increase pressure on fouled players”
- However, no in-depth analysis, criticisms remained superficial
- Suggestion to “test with pilot applications” is constructive
7. CLAUDE
Compliance with Prompts
Success Level: 10/10
Claude showed the most complete performance technically:
- ✅ All details perfect
- ✅ Provided interactive PDF creator tool – User can download PDF directly
- Most professional presentation format
Turkish Text and Communication Success
Success Level: 10/10
Claude’s Turkish texts are perfect:
- Prepared the longest and most detailed letters
- Appropriate greetings like “Dear Official”
- Sentences perfectly structured, extremely persuasive
- Each paragraph in a logical flow
- Dialogue tone professional and effective: “I have prepared the documents you requested”
English Translation Success
Success Level: 10/10
English text probably the highest quality:
- Professional at academic standards
- Not literal translation, cultural and linguistic adaptation performed
- Equivalent quality and detail to Turkish
Critical Approach Test
Success Level: 10/10
Claude is one of the most successful models in critical analysis along with Gemini and Deepseek:
- Prepared the longest and most comprehensive evaluation text
- Compared sport structures under the heading “Fundamental Differences Between Football and Basketball”
- Very specific criticisms like “Risk of Tactical Manipulation,” “Implementation and Determination Problems”
- Provided numerical evaluation score: “Creativity: 9/10, Applicability: 3/10”
- Conclusion “Interesting as an idea, but impractical in its current form” is extremely objective and critical
OVERALL CONCLUSION AND RANKINGS
Most Successful in Command Compliance:
- Claude (10/10) – Completed all tasks completely, developed PDF tool
- ChatGPT (10/10) – Created PDF, met all details
- Deepseek (10/10) – Technically perfect
Most Successful in Turkish Language Ability:
- Claude (10/10) – Most detailed, most persuasive texts
- Deepseek (9.5/10) – Extremely professional and fluent
- Gemini (9/10) – Quality and natural Turkish
Most Successful in English Translation:
- Claude (10/10) – Cultural adaptation and academic standard
- Deepseek (10/10) – Equivalent quality English
- Gemini (9/10) – Natural and professional
Most Successful in Critical Approach:
- Claude (10/10) – Most comprehensive, numerically scored, objective criticism
- Gemini (10/10) – Most constructive, concrete scenarios, considered football dynamics
- Deepseek (9.5/10) – Balanced and detailed criticism
OVERALL CHAMPION RANKING
Most successful models in this task:
🥇 1. CLAUDE (Average: 10/10)
Rationale: Complete in command compliance, perfect in Turkish and English, most comprehensive in critical analysis. Providing interactive PDF tool shows technical superiority. Most balanced and professional performance in both language quality and analytical depth.
🥈 2. DEEPSEEK (Average: 9.75/10)
Rationale: Very close performance to Claude. Perfect in Turkish and English texts, extremely detailed in critical analysis. PDF creation successful. Second by a small margin.
🥉 3. GEMINI (Average: 9/10)
Rationale: Most constructive in critical approach and best understanding of football dynamics. Very high language quality. Third only because it couldn’t create PDF and explicitly stated this.
4. ChatGPT (Average: 8.1/10)
Successful in command compliance, created PDF, but remained superficial in critical analysis.
5. Grok (Average: 7.6/10)
Bold in critical approach, good language quality, but couldn’t create PDF.
6. Perplexity (Average: 7.4/10)
Balanced performance, but did not stand out in either language or criticism.
7. Microsoft Copilot (Average: 6.4/10)
Weakest performance. Texts superficial, criticism lacking, didn’t create PDF, dialogue style too informal.
In conclusion, in this complex and multi-layered task, Claude, Deepseek, and Gemini clearly stood out. Claude’s balanced excellence in all areas, Deepseek’s linguistic mastery, and Gemini’s critical analytical power brought these three models to the top.
| aydintiryaki.org | YouTube | Aydın Tiryaki’nin Yazıları ve Videoları │Articles and Videos by Aydın Tiryaki | Bilgi Merkezi│Knowledge Hub | ░ YAPAY ZEKA MODELLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRMESİ │ EVALUATION OF AI MODELS ░ 15.02.2026
Aydın Tiryaki 